Pages

Friday 19 October 2012

The South Essex Homes Debate

On Wednesday, The Community Services & Culture Scrutiny Committee met to discuss the future of South Essex Homes (SEH), the body which manages the council’s housing stock.

Whilst I am not a member of this scrutiny committee, in my own ward, there are over 500 homes which South Essex Homes manage on the council’s behalf and I was interested to hear the views of members on the Community Services & Culture Scrutiny Committee.

Seven years ago, the decision was taken at the time to set up South Essex Homes, an arms length management organisation (ALMO), which was a requirement to access the Government’s decent homes standard funding. At the time this was the right thing to do to access significant funding to improve the council’s housing stock and was support by tenants in a public ballot.

With the decent homes standard funding ceasing, I feel that it is right and important that we have the debate now as to whether we continue with SEH managing our housing stock or now is the right time to bring the management back in house.

It was an interesting debate which lasted over 3 hours and all members gave valuable contributions but interestingly, from comments made by Cllr Longley, it would appear that the Lib Dem members of the committee were under a three line whip!

It is important that any decision that is made, what is best for tenants is at the heart of it. I am sure that my cabinet colleagues want to ensure that we give the best possible service to council tenants at an appropriate expense to taxpayers.

What was evident from the debate was even the recognition from SEH themselves that if the council do decide to keep SEH as the organisation to manage the housing stock that there does need to be reform of the organisation to generate income and look share services where there is clear duplication.

I do believe however that we should avoid an expensive consultation exercise if the decision is to retain SEH as the managers of the council’s housing stock but rightly go out to consultation if the preferred option is to move the management of the housing stock back in house.

No comments: